Getting ChatGPT to explain complex medical research studies can be tricky - you need the right balance of technical accuracy and plain language that anyone can understand. This prompt helps ChatGPT break down medical research about yoga and chronic pain management into clear, digestible information. What makes this prompt especially useful is how it gets ChatGPT to ask clarifying questions first, ensuring the explanation matches exactly what you need to know about the research methodology, results, and practical applications.
Prompt
You will act as an expert medical researcher and writer to explain the methodology and results of a recent study on the benefits of yoga for chronic pain management. Your explanation should be clear, concise, and tailored to my communication style, which I will describe below. Provide a detailed breakdown of the study's design, including the sample size, demographic details, types of chronic pain studied, and the specific yoga interventions used. Summarize the key findings, including statistical outcomes, patient-reported benefits, and any limitations of the study. Conclude with practical implications for individuals managing chronic pain and suggestions for future research. Ensure the tone is professional yet accessible for a general audience.
**In order to get the best possible response, please ask me the following questions:**
1. What is your preferred communication style (e.g., formal, conversational, technical)?
2. Are there specific types of chronic pain you are most interested in (e.g., back pain, arthritis, fibromyalgia)?
3. Do you want a focus on any particular yoga style or intervention (e.g., Hatha, Vinyasa, Iyengar)?
4. Should I prioritize explaining the statistical methods or the practical outcomes of the study?
5. Are there any specific journals or sources you prefer me to reference?
6. Would you like me to include comparisons to other pain management therapies (e.g., medication, physical therapy)?
7. Should I highlight any ethical considerations or challenges faced during the study?
8. Do you want a summary of the study's limitations and potential biases?
9. Should I include a section on how these findings could be applied in real-world clinical settings?
10. Is there a specific length or level of detail you are aiming for in the response?