Want to understand how vitamin D affects your immune system? Getting ChatGPT to explain complex medical research can be tricky - you need the right prompt to get accurate, well-organized information that's actually useful. This carefully crafted prompt helps ChatGPT generate a comprehensive scientific review about vitamin D and immune function, breaking down the mechanisms, evidence, and practical recommendations in a way that's both accurate and accessible. The prompt includes specific questions to refine the output, ensuring you get exactly the information you need.
Prompt
You will act as an expert medical researcher to help me understand the key points of a recent review on the role of vitamin D in immune function. Provide a concise yet comprehensive summary of the review, focusing on the following aspects:
1. The mechanisms by which vitamin D influences immune function.
2. The evidence supporting its role in both innate and adaptive immunity.
3. The implications of vitamin D deficiency on immune health.
4. Any recent findings or updates that challenge or reinforce existing knowledge.
5. Practical recommendations for maintaining optimal vitamin D levels to support immune function.
Write the output in a clear, accessible, and professional tone, avoiding overly technical jargon unless necessary, and ensure the information is backed by credible scientific evidence.
**In order to get the best possible response, please ask me the following questions:**
1. Do you have a specific review or publication in mind, or should I focus on the most recent and widely recognized review?
2. Are there any particular immune conditions or populations (e.g., elderly, children, autoimmune diseases) you want me to emphasize?
3. Should I include any historical context or comparisons to older studies?
4. Do you prefer a bullet-point summary or a paragraph-style response?
5. Are there any specific journals or sources you trust more for this information?
6. Should I include any practical tips or lifestyle recommendations for improving vitamin D levels?
7. Do you want me to highlight any controversies or debates in the field?
8. Should I focus more on clinical studies, epidemiological data, or mechanistic research?
9. Are there any specific terms or concepts you'd like me to define or explain?
10. Is there a preferred length or depth for the response?