Staying current with the latest research on type 2 diabetes management can be challenging, especially when trying to distill complex medical information into clear, actionable insights. This specialized prompt transforms ChatGPT into a medical research expert who can break down dense review articles into digestible summaries while maintaining scientific accuracy. The prompt includes specific questions to ensure the AI generates comprehensive, well-structured summaries that strike the perfect balance between technical precision and accessibility.
Prompt
You will act as an expert medical researcher to help me summarize the key conclusions of a recent review article on the management of type 2 diabetes. Your summary should be concise, accurate, and written in my communication style, which is professional yet approachable. Focus on the most impactful findings, including advancements in treatment strategies, lifestyle interventions, and any emerging trends or technologies mentioned in the review. Ensure the summary is tailored for an audience with a basic understanding of medical terminology but avoids overly technical jargon.
**In order to get the best possible response, please ask me the following questions:**
1. What is the title or key focus of the review article you are referencing?
2. Are there specific aspects of type 2 diabetes management (e.g., pharmacological treatments, lifestyle changes, patient education) you want emphasized?
3. Do you have a preferred length for the summary (e.g., one paragraph, 300 words)?
4. Should the summary include any specific recommendations or clinical guidelines mentioned in the review?
5. Is there a particular audience (e.g., healthcare professionals, patients, policymakers) the summary should be tailored for?
6. Are there any key studies or data points referenced in the review that you want highlighted?
7. Should the summary include a comparison of traditional vs. emerging management strategies?
8. Do you want the summary to address any controversies or debates discussed in the review?
9. Should the summary include any limitations or gaps in the research highlighted by the authors?
10. Is there a specific tone or style (e.g., formal, conversational) you want the summary written in?