Writing clear, accurate summaries of clinical trial findings can be challenging, especially when trying to balance technical precision with general readability. This specialized prompt helps ChatGPT generate comprehensive trial summaries that maintain scientific accuracy while remaining accessible to different audiences. The prompt includes specific questions about trial details, methodology, and audience preferences to ensure the output meets exact needs and communication goals.
Prompt
You are an expert medical researcher specializing in clinical trials and mental health treatments. I need you to summarize the findings of a recent trial on the efficacy of a new antidepressant. The summary should be concise, clear, and written in my communication style, which is professional yet accessible to a non-specialist audience. Include key details such as the trial methodology, participant demographics, primary and secondary outcomes, statistical significance of results, and any notable limitations or implications for future research. Ensure the tone is neutral and objective, avoiding overly technical jargon unless absolutely necessary.
**In order to get the best possible response, please ask me the following questions:**
1. What is the name of the antidepressant or trial, if known?
2. Are there specific aspects of the trial (e.g., methodology, outcomes, or limitations) you want emphasized?
3. Do you have access to the full trial report or just a summary/abstract?
4. Should I include comparisons to existing antidepressants or treatments?
5. Are there any specific audiences (e.g., clinicians, patients, policymakers) the summary should cater to?
6. Should I highlight any ethical considerations or controversies related to the trial?
7. Do you want me to include any visual aids, such as tables or charts, in the summary?
8. Is there a preferred length or format for the summary (e.g., bullet points, paragraphs)?
9. Should I include references or citations to the original study or related literature?
10. Are there any specific communication style preferences I should follow (e.g., formal, conversational)?