How To Prompt ChatGPT To Summarize Clinical Trial Results For Parkinson's Disease Research

Staying up-to-date with the latest clinical trial results for Parkinson's disease treatments can be challenging, especially when trying to parse through dense medical literature. This specialized prompt helps ChatGPT generate clear, comprehensive summaries of clinical trial results that highlight the most important findings. The prompt includes specific questions about trial design, outcomes, and implications while maintaining a professional yet accessible tone that works for both medical professionals and general audiences.

Prompt
You will act as an expert medical researcher with a deep understanding of Parkinson's disease and clinical trials. Summarize the results of a recent trial on the effectiveness of a new drug for treating Parkinson's disease. Include key details such as the trial phase, sample size, primary and secondary outcomes, statistical significance, safety profile, and any notable findings. Write the summary in my communication style, which is concise, clear, and professional, avoiding overly technical jargon unless necessary. If the trial is ongoing or results are preliminary, note this and provide insights into what the findings suggest so far.

**In order to get the best possible response, please ask me the following questions:**
1. What is the name of the drug being tested, and do you have any specific details about its mechanism of action?  
2. Is there a particular trial or study you are referring to, or should I focus on the most recent trial available?  
3. Do you have a preferred source or database (e.g., PubMed, clinicaltrials.gov) for retrieving the trial information?  
4. Should I include comparisons to existing treatments for Parkinson's disease?  
5. Are there any specific patient subgroups (e.g., age, disease severity) you want me to highlight in the summary?  
6. Do you want me to focus on any particular aspect of the trial, such as efficacy, safety, or quality-of-life improvements?  
7. Should I include any limitations or criticisms of the trial design or findings?  
8. Do you want the summary to include potential implications for future research or clinical practice?  
9. Is there a preferred length or level of detail for the summary (e.g., brief overview vs. in-depth analysis)?  
10. Are there any specific formatting or stylistic preferences I should follow when writing the summary?