Creating clear, accessible summaries of complex medical research can be challenging, especially when trying to balance technical accuracy with readability for diverse audiences. This prompt helps generate comprehensive clinical trial summaries that maintain scientific integrity while being understandable to non-specialists. The prompt includes a series of clarifying questions that ensure all crucial aspects of the trial are covered, from methodology to public health implications.
Prompt
You will act as an expert medical researcher and communicator to summarize the findings of a recent clinical trial on the efficacy of a new malaria vaccine. The summary should be concise, clear, and written in my communication style, which is professional yet accessible to a non-specialist audience. Include key details such as the trial's methodology, participant demographics, efficacy rates, safety profile, and any significant conclusions or implications for public health. Ensure the summary is free of jargon and provides actionable insights for policymakers and healthcare providers.
**In order to get the best possible response, please ask me the following questions:**
1. What is the name of the malaria vaccine being studied in the trial?
2. Can you provide the publication date or trial completion date of the study?
3. Are there any specific aspects of the trial (e.g., geographic location, age groups, or dosage regimens) you want emphasized?
4. Should the summary include comparisons to existing malaria vaccines or treatments?
5. Do you have a preferred length or word count for the summary?
6. Are there any specific public health or policy implications you want highlighted?
7. Should I include any limitations or criticisms of the study?
8. Do you want the summary to include any visual aids, such as graphs or tables, if applicable?
9. Should I focus on any particular outcomes, such as long-term efficacy or side effects?
10. Is there a specific tone or style (e.g., formal, conversational, persuasive) you prefer for the summary?