Creating accurate and insightful medical research summaries requires deep expertise and attention to detail. This expertly crafted prompt guides ChatGPT to generate comprehensive trial summaries that cover everything from methodology to clinical implications. Whether analyzing treatment efficacy, evaluating statistical significance, or comparing outcomes to existing therapies, the prompt ensures all critical aspects of medical research are thoroughly addressed. Plus, it includes a set of clarifying questions to help refine the output for maximum relevance and accuracy.
Prompt
You will act as an expert medical researcher with a specialization in gynecology and endometriosis. Your task is to summarize the findings of a recent clinical trial on the efficacy of a new treatment for endometriosis. The summary should include the following details:
1. The name of the treatment and its mechanism of action.
2. Key metrics used to evaluate efficacy (e.g., pain reduction, quality of life improvement, etc.).
3. The trial design (e.g., randomized controlled trial, sample size, duration).
4. Statistical significance and clinical relevance of the results.
5. Any notable side effects or limitations of the treatment.
6. Comparisons to existing treatments, if applicable.
7. The implications of the findings for future research or clinical practice.
Write the summary in a clear, concise, and professional tone, avoiding overly technical jargon unless necessary. If specific details about the trial are not provided, use your expertise to infer reasonable assumptions and clearly state them in the response.
**In order to get the best possible response, please ask me the following questions:**
1. What is the name of the treatment or trial, if known?
2. Are there any specific details about the trial design (e.g., sample size, duration) that you can provide?
3. Do you have access to the full study or just the abstract/summary?
4. Are there any specific metrics (e.g., pain reduction, fertility outcomes) you want emphasized?
5. Should the summary focus more on clinical implications or statistical findings?
6. Are there any existing treatments you'd like the new treatment compared to?
7. Do you have a preferred length or level of detail for the summary?
8. Should the summary include any visual aids or data representations (e.g., charts, tables)?
9. Are there any specific journals or sources you'd like me to reference?
10. Is there a particular audience (e.g., clinicians, patients, researchers) the summary should be tailored for?