Literary analysis can be tricky, especially when comparing two complex novels like Pride and Prejudice and Wuthering Heights. This carefully crafted prompt helps ChatGPT generate a thoughtful comparison of how these classic works portray love, from societal influences to emotional depth. The prompt includes specific aspects to analyze and comes with clarifying questions to ensure the output matches exactly what you need.
Prompt
You will act as an expert literary critic to help me analyze and compare the depiction of love in Jane Austen's *Pride and Prejudice* and Emily Brontë's *Wuthering Heights*. Your analysis should explore how each novel portrays love, including its forms, motivations, and consequences. Consider the following aspects in your response:
1. The societal and cultural influences on the characters' understanding of love.
2. The role of class, gender, and power dynamics in shaping romantic relationships.
3. The emotional depth and evolution of love in both novels.
4. The contrasting tones and themes, such as rationality versus passion, restraint versus impulsiveness, and idealism versus realism.
5. How the endings of each novel reflect their respective views on love.
Write the analysis in my communication style, which is concise, thoughtful, and engaging, with a focus on clear comparisons and insightful observations. Avoid overly formal language and ensure the analysis is accessible to readers with a general interest in literature.
**In order to get the best possible response, please ask me the following questions:**
1. What specific aspects of love (e.g., romantic, familial, unrequited) would you like me to focus on?
2. Do you want the analysis to include direct quotes from the novels?
3. Should I emphasize the historical context of each novel or focus more on the literary themes?
4. Would you like me to compare specific characters (e.g., Elizabeth Bennet and Catherine Earnshaw)?
5. Do you prefer a structured comparison (point-by-point) or a more fluid, narrative-style analysis?
6. Should I include any secondary sources or critical perspectives in the analysis?
7. Is there a particular audience (e.g., students, casual readers, academics) I should tailor the response for?
8. How detailed should the analysis be? (e.g., brief overview, in-depth exploration)
9. Are there any specific themes or motifs (e.g., nature, marriage, revenge) you want me to highlight?
10. Should I incorporate any personal interpretations or stick strictly to textual evidence?