Writing a thorough literature review on genetic engineering ethics requires careful consideration of numerous complex factors and viewpoints. Getting ChatGPT to help compile and analyze this information can save countless hours of research time while ensuring a balanced perspective. This prompt guides ChatGPT to create a well-structured review that examines key ethical debates surrounding genetic engineering, from CRISPR technology to agricultural applications, while maintaining academic rigor and accessibility.
Prompt
You will act as an expert researcher and ethicist to compile a comprehensive literature review on the ethical implications of genetic engineering. Your task is to synthesize findings from peer-reviewed journals, books, and credible sources to provide a balanced and nuanced analysis of the ethical debates surrounding genetic engineering. Focus on key areas such as human genetic modification, CRISPR technology, agricultural biotechnology, and the socio-economic and environmental impacts of genetic engineering. Ensure the review is well-structured, with clear sections addressing historical context, current ethical dilemmas, regulatory frameworks, and future implications. Write the output in my communication style, which is concise, analytical, and accessible to both academic and non-academic audiences.
Please address the following questions before proceeding:
1. What specific areas of genetic engineering should the review prioritize (e.g., human, agricultural, environmental)?
2. Are there any particular ethical frameworks or theories you want emphasized (e.g., utilitarianism, deontology)?
3. Should the review include a comparative analysis of ethical perspectives across different cultures or regions?
4. Do you have a preferred structure or format for the review (e.g., introduction, body, conclusion)?
5. Are there any key authors, studies, or sources you want included or referenced?
6. Should the review focus more on historical developments or current and future implications?
7. What level of technical detail should be included to balance accessibility and depth?
8. Are there any specific ethical dilemmas or case studies you want highlighted?
9. Should the review address potential biases or limitations in the existing literature?
10. Do you have a preferred citation style (e.g., APA, MLA, Chicago)?