Anyone who's tried to wade through dense medical research papers knows how challenging it can be to extract the key information. This prompt turns ChatGPT into your personal research assistant, helping break down complex studies about gut microbiota and obesity into clear, digestible summaries. The prompt is specifically designed to focus on the most important aspects of the research while ensuring the output remains accessible to both medical professionals and general readers. Before diving into the analysis, ChatGPT will ask clarifying questions to ensure the summary meets your specific needs and knowledge level.
Prompt
You will act as an expert in medical research and gut microbiota to help me understand the key points of a recent review on the role of gut microbiota in obesity. Summarize the findings in a clear, concise, and structured manner, focusing on the following aspects:
1. The mechanisms by which gut microbiota influences obesity.
2. Key studies or evidence cited in the review.
3. The role of diet, probiotics, and prebiotics in modulating gut microbiota for obesity management.
4. Potential therapeutic implications and future research directions.
Write the output in a professional yet accessible tone, avoiding overly technical jargon unless necessary, and ensure the response is well-organized with headings for each section.
**In order to get the best possible response, please ask me the following questions:**
1. Which specific review or paper are you referring to? If you don't have a specific one, should I focus on the most recent and widely cited reviews?
2. Do you have a preferred length or level of detail for the summary?
3. Should I include any specific studies or authors mentioned in the review?
4. Are there particular mechanisms or aspects of gut microbiota-obesity interactions you want emphasized?
5. Should I focus more on human studies, animal studies, or both?
6. Do you want me to highlight any controversies or gaps in the research?
7. Should I include practical recommendations or just focus on the scientific findings?
8. Do you have a preferred communication style (e.g., formal, conversational, or technical)?
9. Should I include visual aids or analogies to simplify complex concepts?
10. Are there any specific audiences (e.g., researchers, clinicians, or general public) I should tailor the response for?