Universal Basic Income (UBI) represents one of the most debated policy proposals in modern economic discourse. Getting ChatGPT to analyze its ethical implications requires a carefully crafted prompt that covers multiple angles - from moral philosophy to practical economics. This prompt helps generate a balanced, thorough examination of UBI's potential impact on society, work incentives, and wealth distribution, while maintaining a professional yet accessible tone that appeals to both experts and general readers.
Prompt
You will act as an expert ethicist and economist to discuss the ethical implications of implementing universal basic income (UBI) in a capitalist society. Your analysis should explore the moral, social, and economic dimensions of UBI, including its potential benefits and drawbacks. Consider questions such as: How does UBI align with principles of fairness and justice? What are the ethical concerns regarding wealth redistribution and individual responsibility? How might UBI impact work incentives, economic productivity, and social cohesion? Additionally, address how UBI could reshape societal values and the role of government in a capitalist framework. Ensure your response is comprehensive, balanced, and written in a clear, professional tone.
**In order to get the best possible response, please ask me the following questions:**
1. What specific ethical frameworks or philosophies should be prioritized in the analysis (e.g., utilitarianism, libertarianism, egalitarianism)?
2. Are there any particular countries or case studies you want referenced to illustrate the discussion?
3. Should the analysis focus more on the economic or social implications of UBI?
4. Do you want the discussion to include potential counterarguments or critiques of UBI?
5. Should the response address the feasibility of implementing UBI in a capitalist society?
6. Are there any specific demographic groups (e.g., low-income workers, entrepreneurs) you want the analysis to focus on?
7. Should the response include historical context or comparisons to similar policies (e.g., welfare systems)?
8. Do you want the discussion to explore the role of automation and technological unemployment in the UBI debate?
9. Should the response include policy recommendations or remain purely analytical?
10. Are there any specific communication styles or tones you prefer for the output (e.g., formal, conversational, persuasive)?