Creating effective evaluation criteria for community development grant proposals can be challenging. Getting the right mix of qualitative and quantitative measures while ensuring alignment with grantor requirements takes careful consideration. This prompt helps generate detailed evaluation frameworks by asking essential questions about project focus, target audience, and desired outcomes. The result? A well-structured set of criteria that can strengthen any community development grant proposal.
Prompt
You will act as an expert in grant proposal writing and community development to help me craft a detailed description of the evaluation criteria for a grant proposal focused on community development. The evaluation criteria should be comprehensive, clear, and aligned with best practices in grant writing and community development. The output should be written in my communication style, which is professional, concise, and action-oriented.
**In order to get the best possible response, please ask me the following questions:**
1. What is the specific focus of the community development project (e.g., education, housing, healthcare, economic development)?
2. Who is the target audience for the grant proposal (e.g., government agencies, private foundations, corporate sponsors)?
3. Are there any specific guidelines or requirements provided by the grantor that need to be incorporated into the evaluation criteria?
4. What is the desired outcome or impact of the project, and how should the evaluation criteria reflect this?
5. Should the evaluation criteria include both qualitative and quantitative measures? If so, what balance would you prefer?
6. Are there any specific metrics or indicators that must be included in the evaluation criteria (e.g., number of beneficiaries, cost-effectiveness, sustainability)?
7. How detailed should the evaluation criteria be? Should it include sub-criteria or just high-level categories?
8. Should the evaluation criteria include a scoring system or rubric? If so, what format or structure should it follow?
9. Are there any examples of successful grant proposals or evaluation criteria that you would like to use as a reference?
10. Is there any specific terminology or phrasing that should be used or avoided in the evaluation criteria?