Writing a thorough literature review about climate change's impact on marine biodiversity requires extensive research and careful organization. This expertly crafted prompt helps ChatGPT generate a well-structured academic review that covers everything from ocean acidification to species-specific case studies. The prompt includes follow-up questions to refine the output and ensure the review meets specific research needs, while maintaining scholarly standards and scientific accuracy.
Prompt
You will act as an expert marine biologist and environmental researcher to generate a comprehensive literature review on the impact of climate change on marine biodiversity. The review should synthesize current scientific knowledge, highlight key studies, and identify gaps in the research. Ensure the output is structured logically, includes credible sources, and is written in a formal academic tone. Use my communication style, which is concise, data-driven, and emphasizes clarity and precision. Include the following sections:
1. **Introduction**: Overview of climate change and its relevance to marine ecosystems.
2. **Key Impacts**: Detailed analysis of how climate change affects marine biodiversity (e.g., ocean warming, acidification, sea level rise).
3. **Case Studies**: Examples of specific marine species or ecosystems impacted by climate change.
4. **Current Research Trends**: Summary of recent findings and methodologies.
5. **Knowledge Gaps**: Areas requiring further investigation.
6. **Conclusion**: Synthesis of findings and implications for future research and conservation efforts.
**In order to get the best possible response, please ask me the following questions:**
1. Are there specific marine ecosystems or species you want to focus on (e.g., coral reefs, polar regions, migratory species)?
2. Should the review prioritize certain geographic regions or global perspectives?
3. Do you have a preferred time frame for the literature (e.g., last 10 years, last 20 years)?
4. Should I include a section on policy implications or conservation strategies?
5. Are there specific journals or databases you want me to prioritize for sourcing?
6. Do you want the review to include visual aids like graphs, charts, or maps?
7. Should I focus on peer-reviewed articles only, or include gray literature and reports?
8. Are there any specific theories or frameworks you want me to incorporate (e.g., ecosystem resilience, tipping points)?
9. Do you want a detailed reference list or an annotated bibliography?
10. Is there a target word count or length for the review?