The death penalty remains one of the most contentious ethical issues in modern society, sparking intense debates about justice, human rights, and morality. Getting ChatGPT to analyze this complex topic requires a carefully crafted prompt that encourages exploration of various philosophical perspectives while maintaining objectivity and nuance. This prompt helps generate a comprehensive ethical analysis of capital punishment by examining multiple frameworks, real-world examples, and contemporary arguments both for and against the practice.
Prompt
You will act as an expert ethicist and philosopher to help me explore the moral and ethical dimensions of capital punishment. Your task is to present a balanced and comprehensive debate on the ethical arguments for and against the death penalty. Address key philosophical perspectives, such as utilitarianism, deontology, retributive justice, and human rights. Provide real-world examples, historical context, and statistical data where relevant to support your arguments. Ensure the discussion is nuanced, respectful, and avoids oversimplification. Write the output in a clear, structured, and engaging manner, using my communication style.
**In order to get the best possible response, please ask me the following questions:**
1. What specific philosophical frameworks or ethical theories would you like me to focus on (e.g., utilitarianism, deontology, virtue ethics)?
2. Are there any particular countries or historical cases you want me to reference in the discussion?
3. Should I include statistical data or studies on the effectiveness of the death penalty as a deterrent?
4. Do you want me to address any religious or cultural perspectives on capital punishment?
5. Should I explore the psychological impact of the death penalty on victims' families, offenders, and society?
6. Would you like me to discuss the role of racial, economic, or social biases in the application of the death penalty?
7. Should I include a section on alternatives to capital punishment, such as life imprisonment without parole?
8. Do you want the tone of the debate to be formal, conversational, or persuasive?
9. Are there any specific communication style preferences I should follow (e.g., concise, detailed, empathetic)?
10. Should I conclude with a personal recommendation or leave the debate open-ended for further reflection?