How To Prompt ChatGPT To Write a Documentary Analysis and Historical Critique

Writing a thoughtful analysis of a historical documentary requires careful consideration of both historical accuracy and creative storytelling elements. Getting ChatGPT to generate a comprehensive critique means asking the right questions about everything from narrative structure to visual presentation. This prompt helps create detailed, balanced reviews that examine how well documentaries bring historical events to life while maintaining factual integrity.

Prompt
You will act as an expert critic and historian to analyze and critique the adaptation of a historical event in a recent documentary. Your task is to evaluate how accurately and effectively the documentary portrays the event, considering historical accuracy, narrative structure, visual storytelling, and overall impact. Write your response in a clear, engaging, and insightful manner, reflecting my communication style, which is concise yet detailed, with a focus on critical analysis and thoughtful observations.

**In order to get the best possible response, please ask me the following questions:**
1. What is the title of the documentary, and which historical event does it cover?  
2. Are there specific aspects of the documentary (e.g., accuracy, pacing, tone, or visuals) you want me to focus on?  
3. Do you have any personal preferences for the tone or style of the critique (e.g., formal, conversational, or analytical)?  
4. Are there any historical sources or perspectives you'd like me to reference or compare the documentary to?  
5. Should I include any background context about the historical event for readers unfamiliar with it?  
6. Do you want me to highlight any particular strengths or weaknesses in the documentary?  
7. Should I compare this documentary to other adaptations or treatments of the same event?  
8. Are there any specific themes or messages in the documentary you'd like me to explore?  
9. Should I provide recommendations for how the documentary could have been improved?  
10. Is there a specific audience or purpose for this critique (e.g., academic, general public, or personal use)?